Actions

Difference between revisions of "Fight over limited resources"

From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki

 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In organization with limited resources, people(and most living creatures) [[FFFF|fight]] for the limited resources. In organizations it can be a fight for desired position. They can fight for the attention of decision makers. These fights have many strategies and ways. It can take the form of [[bad-name gossiping]], that makes people disasociated from the "villain". It can take the form of prasining your alies and denauncing the work of your rivals. People will get into coalitions, when one coallition sabotage the work of another coallition.
+
In organizations with limited resources, members (and most living creatures) [[FFFF|fight]] for the limited resources. It can be a fight for desired position or a fight for the attention of decision makers. These fights have many strategies and paths. One of the most common behavior is creating coalitions to fight for the limited resources . It can take the form of [[gossip|bad-name gossiping]], that makes people disassociated from the "bad guys in the other coalition. It can take the form of praising your allies and denouncing the work of your rivals. People will get into coalitions, when one coalition sabotages the work of another coalition.
  
Coalitions will be created around powers every body can give to the coalition. People with low resources (decision making or other important resources to the coalition) will not be important to the head/s of the coalition.
+
In an organization which gives individuals the power to decide about resource allocation to other members of the organization, the allocators can use their power to be "important", and thus make other people cooperate with them.
  
People will envy people who they think got more then they deserv. People manytimes will over-estimate themselves (espeicialy conservatives) and underestimate others.  
+
Coalitions will be created around powers everybody can give to the coalition. People with low resources (decision making or other important resources to the coalition) will not be important to the head/s of the coalition.
  
The solutions to a rivalery in organization can be:
+
People will envy people who they think got more then they deserve. People many times will over-estimate themselves (especially conservatives) and underestimate others.
* cultivating a spirit of mutual dependence and mutual goal. every body has a role, mixture of flavours.
+
 
* creating a decision system in which every-body relay on every-body else (could not work), or just system of decision making (and of course cost-effective), and good spirit.
+
==Solutions==
 +
The solutions to a rivalry in organization can be:
 +
* cultivating a spirit of mutual dependence and mutual goal. Everybody has a role, mixture of flavors.
 +
* creating a decision system in which every-body relay on every-body else (could not work), or a just system of decision making (and of course cost-effective), and good spirit.
 
* Promoting a just system of reward and recognition.
 
* Promoting a just system of reward and recognition.
 +
 +
For other solution see [http://www.partnersinsalford.org/principles-in-good-governance.htm Principles for Effective Partnerships in Salford]
  
 
[[category: Government]]
 
[[category: Government]]

Latest revision as of 23:17, 20 April 2013

In organizations with limited resources, members (and most living creatures) fight for the limited resources. It can be a fight for desired position or a fight for the attention of decision makers. These fights have many strategies and paths. One of the most common behavior is creating coalitions to fight for the limited resources . It can take the form of bad-name gossiping, that makes people disassociated from the "bad guys in the other coalition. It can take the form of praising your allies and denouncing the work of your rivals. People will get into coalitions, when one coalition sabotages the work of another coalition.

In an organization which gives individuals the power to decide about resource allocation to other members of the organization, the allocators can use their power to be "important", and thus make other people cooperate with them.

Coalitions will be created around powers everybody can give to the coalition. People with low resources (decision making or other important resources to the coalition) will not be important to the head/s of the coalition.

People will envy people who they think got more then they deserve. People many times will over-estimate themselves (especially conservatives) and underestimate others.

Solutions

The solutions to a rivalry in organization can be:

  • cultivating a spirit of mutual dependence and mutual goal. Everybody has a role, mixture of flavors.
  • creating a decision system in which every-body relay on every-body else (could not work), or a just system of decision making (and of course cost-effective), and good spirit.
  • Promoting a just system of reward and recognition.

For other solution see Principles for Effective Partnerships in Salford