Difference between revisions of "System 2"
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
System 2 can have more influence on self conventions (The elephant) if you delay response to stimulus<ref>Paxton, J.M., Ungar, L., Greene, J.D., (2011 [http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~jgreene/GreeneWJH/Paxton-Ungar-Greene-MoralReasoning-CogSci11.pdf ePub]). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science</ref><ref>haidt, 2012, the ritious mind, p. 81</ref>. | System 2 can have more influence on self conventions (The elephant) if you delay response to stimulus<ref>Paxton, J.M., Ungar, L., Greene, J.D., (2011 [http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~jgreene/GreeneWJH/Paxton-Ungar-Greene-MoralReasoning-CogSci11.pdf ePub]). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science</ref><ref>haidt, 2012, the ritious mind, p. 81</ref>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===System 2 and LibCon=== | ||
| + | It seems that open-mindedness according to Cognitive Reflection Test is not correlated with [[Conservatives and Liberals|conservatism]]<ref>[http://www.culturalcognition.net/blog/2013/7/31/motivated-system-2-reasoning-experimental-evidence-its-signi.html Dan Kahan (2013), Motivated system 2 reasoning--experimental evidence & its significance for explaining political polarization - review]</ref>. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 04:03, 11 August 2013
System 1 or Effortful System is the system dealing with complex thinking. It can follow rules, compare objects on several attributes, and make deliberate choices between options[1].
It is part of two systems of decision making, the first is the automatic-system(system 1) which decide fast by intuition and the second is the ECS which produce reasoning.The term system 1 and system 2 was given by Stanovich and West[2]
It seems to be activated by conflict detection in the ACC.
It seems to be reinforeced by rewords[3][4]
Rolls et al. describe the areas in which explicit (? system 2) and implicit (? system 1) decision making is done[5]. System-1 is handeld by the basal ganglia, and system-2 is handeld by the PFC[6][7][8].
System 2 may be mostly correlated with Reward Prediction Error RPE.
System 2 can have more influence on self conventions (The elephant) if you delay response to stimulus[9][10].
System 2 and LibCon
It seems that open-mindedness according to Cognitive Reflection Test is not correlated with conservatism[11].
References
- ↑ Khanman D., 2011, Thinking fast, Thinking slow p. 36
- ↑ Stanovich KE, West RF., Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Oct;23(5):645-65; discussion 665-726.
- ↑ Henk van Steenbergen, Guido P.H. Band & Bernhard Hommel, Reward valence modulates conflict-driven attentional adaptation: Electrophysiological evidence, Biological Psychology 90 (2012) 234–241
- ↑ Senne Braem, Tom Verguts, Chantal Roggeman, Wim Notebaert, Reward modulates adaptations to conflict, Cognition (August 2012), doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.015
- ↑ Value, pleasure and choice in the ventral prefrontal cortex. Fabian Grabenhorst, Edmund T Rolls (2011) Trends in cognitive sciences 15 (2) p. 56-67(summery)
- ↑ Rolls, E.T. and Grabenhorst, F. (2008) The orbitofrontal cortex and beyond: from affect to decision-making. Prog. Neurobiol. 86, 216–244
- ↑ Rolls, E.T. (2005) Emotion Explained, Oxford University Press
- ↑ Balleine, B.W. and O’Doherty, J.P. (2010) Human and rodent homologies in action control: corticostriatal determinants of goaldirected and habitual action. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 48–69
- ↑ Paxton, J.M., Ungar, L., Greene, J.D., (2011 ePub). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science
- ↑ haidt, 2012, the ritious mind, p. 81
- ↑ Dan Kahan (2013), Motivated system 2 reasoning--experimental evidence & its significance for explaining political polarization - review