Difference between revisions of "Main Page"
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
(→Our Mission) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | ==Our Mission== | + | ===Our Mission=== |
| − | Development of culture, technologies and methods of deliberation and democratic decision making | + | Development of culture, [[delib.org|technologies]] and methods of deliberation and democratic decision making |
To realize this mission we are devloping tools and methodologies that allow discussions and informed decision-making in democratic conventions. We will train facilitators, and advance practical reaserch of the filed of deliberation. | To realize this mission we are devloping tools and methodologies that allow discussions and informed decision-making in democratic conventions. We will train facilitators, and advance practical reaserch of the filed of deliberation. | ||
Revision as of 00:39, 7 August 2016
Wiki of the Deliberative Democracy Institiute
Theory and Practice on Deliberative Democracy
Our Mission
Development of culture, technologies and methods of deliberation and democratic decision making
To realize this mission we are devloping tools and methodologies that allow discussions and informed decision-making in democratic conventions. We will train facilitators, and advance practical reaserch of the filed of deliberation.
Technologies and methodologies that will be developd, will serve communities, organizations, municipalities and governments to develop dialogue and shared decision making, informed and agreed.
Editing & Contributions: If you want to help editing or writing in this wiki, please contact tal dot yaron at gmail dot com.
Contents
Introduction
Deliberative democracy is a form of democracy in which citzenry deliberation is central to decision-making. It put high value on envolving larger parts of the poulation in decision making of the governing bodies. citizen should have an equal voice and that every citizen should have equal influence in the shaping of public solutions. It manifests that when making a public decisions, every option should be taken into account, even if it’s owners do not have much education in the subject. The reason for that, is that every citizen has her own interests in the public decision, and they may be influenced by the choices the decision body will make.
However, letting every citizen participate in the discussion and influence the option taken by the public, results in tedious and endless meetings. Many citizens want to shape the solution, while many others want to propose their own unique solutions or criticize the ideas brought to the table. Equal deliberation may be a very cumbersome process that takes huge amounts of energy and time. If all the residents of a small town would have the same influence on the solutions proposed, the deliberation may take years. As the body of decision makers grows, so do the time and energy it takes to make an equal decision. Because of its tediousness many citizens prefer not to participate in it, therefore making equal deliberation null.
So, if we want to keep the ideals of deliberation of real equality, while making the process efficient and suited for the participating of thousands and millions, we have to learn how deliberation works. What are her elements and how do they interact with each other? If we will be able to understand the elements we will be able to suggest more efficient ways to conduct equal public deliberation, and even invent a new application that may help larger groups of citizens engage in the public decisions.
In this website we will suggest a theory that will explain the elements of deliberation and their interactions. We will then investigate the common practices of deliberation and analyze them according to the theory. Lastly, we will suggest a future process for deliberative democracy and develop apps for deliberative democracy. The current app we are working on is delib.org. The code for delib can be found here.
The Challenges
Values of Deliberation
In a democracy, all citizens are considered equal members in society, with equal rights to take part in public decision making. To ensure that all citizens could take part in decision making, scholars of deliberative democracy suggested several values that deliberators should follow in their deliberative process. Read more...
Challenges in deliberation
The Elements
To successfully engage and understand deliberation, I suggest that we first have to understand the elements of decision making. The elements are divided into several areas. The first area is the area of cognitive elements, which are the elements that interacts in the brain to facilitate a decision. Next is the area of the group in decision making - which elements are crucial for decision making in groups. Then comes the area of communication medium. In this area we will describe the elements that influence the transformation of information between the group members. In the next areas, we will deal with the psychological, sociological and organizational elements.
The cognitive elements of decision making
The basic entities of decision making in a group, are her members. Every member that takes part in decision, uses cognitive process to gather information and make decision. So, the first step in understanding deliberation is to describe these personal cognitive elements that members are using to make their decisions. When we will understand the personal cognitive elements, we will be able to start to understand the more complex interaction between the members. read more...
 This page is a stub. It is not ready for publication and is used to aggregate information about a subject. You can add further reading and add information to the page. If you want to prepare this page for publication please consults with the creator of this page. |
Neuropsychology Elements in decision making
neuropsychology elements in decision making
Group Elements in Decision Making
Medium Elemnts in Decision Making
Sociology Elements in Decision Making
Organizations Elements in Decision Making
Organizations in Decision Making
Processes
Personal Decision Making
Methods in Organizations
Technologies
Tech Platforms for Civic-Participation - Public Version.
Compering the Model to Deleberative Methods
Methods in deliberative democracy